Strategic Analysis of Monzo and Revolut
This report will explore companies Monzo and Revolut, and will conduct a joint PESTLE analysis and individual SWOT analyses of both companies. These analyses will help to evaluate the external and internal environmental factors that could impact the companies in the future. Under the PESTLE analysis and each SWOT table, some more in-depth analysis of the identified external and internal factors will be conducted and explained. A comparison of the two companies, based on these analyses will then be presented, and a conclusion of some of the main take-away points will end the report.
2.0 What is Monzo?
Monzo is a mobile-only, digital bank that is based in the United Kingdom (Carey, 2018). It was one of the first of several new app-based banks, known as ‘challenger banks’ in the UK (Carey, 2018). Originally, the company operated through a mobile application and a pre-paid debit card, but when UK banking licence restrictions were lifted in 2017, the company were able to offer a current account to consumers (Monzo, 2017). More than 750,000 people are now using the company’s current accounts and more than two billion pounds has been spent through Monzo so far (Monzo, 2019).
3.0 What is Revolut?
Revolut is a UK based financial technology company, offering various banking services, such as prepaid debit cards, cryptocurrency exchange and fee-free currency exchange (Dillet, 2015). With a standard account with Revolut, a consumer gets a free UK current account and a free euro IBAN account (Russon, 2019). Originally Revolut was not a bank and in December 2018 announced that it had been granted an EU banking licence (Russon, 2019). Currently, the company’s services are only available in Europe but Revolut has already reached 4.5 million customers, 1.6 million of which are in the UK (Russon, 2019).
4.0 PESTLE Analysis Table
|Political interference is a big risk in the banking industry (Moore, 2010). December elections could impact banking policies – new government could mean new legislation or regulations. Brexit could have big impacts for many sectors, including banking (Partington, 2019).||Economic losses from fraud in banking industry are very high (Crowe, 2019). UK economy could be drastically impacted by Brexit, e.g rapid increase in joblessness, impact on GDP and inflation (Partington and Weardon, 2019).||Engagement with mobile banks with UK consumer is on the rise (Fawthrop, 2019a). In the UK 71% of all banking interactions are online or digital, and this is set to increase further (Fawthrop, 2019b). Demand for digital banking amongst UK customers has grown substantially in 2018 (Mastercard, n.d).|
|Key barriers to adoption of banking technology is security and privacy concerns (Greaves, 2019). 85% people prefer not to talk to a robot when banking (Fawthrop, 2019c). Only 15% of people want institutions to invest in voice-banking services powered by AI (Fawthrop, 2019c).||Environmental crisis has led to more people wanting to lower their carbon footprint and be environmentally friendly. This means digital banks could be favoured as the need to drive to a branch is reduced, alongside less need for paper use, and in-branch energy usage (Townsend, 2018).||High probability for change in regulations in many industries, including banking, due to Brexit, and December election in the UK. Current intense scrutiny for digital banks due to allegations such as fraudulent accounting and toxic management culture (Finextra Research, 2019).|
4.1 Political Factors
The banking industry as a whole can be heavily impacted by political interference (Moore, 2010). According to one report, ‘Politicisation’ of banks resulting from takeovers and bailouts may pose a major threat to their financial health (Moore, 2010). Political instability caused by Brexit may also have a significant impact on the banking industry (Partington, 2019). Political instability can cause problems such as investors not wanting to commit to companies, negative impact on credit constraints and capital accumulation (Herrela and Ariss, 2013). In particular, in the UK December election results may impact Monzo and the banking industry as a whole as if a different party wins, this could mean new regulations or legislation could be implemented.
4.2 Economic Factors
Economic losses resulting from fraud are very high, with the global cost of economic fraud, when taken as a proportion of global GDP for 2017, being equal to £3.24 trillion (Crowe, 2019). This suggests that fraud could be a key issue for Monzo and Revolut, and something that the companies should try and prioritise and protect themselves against. The UK economy could be drastically impacted by Brexit, which could then have a knock-on effect on the banking industry. There is a lot of debate about what the impact of Brexit would be on the banking industry, with the governor of the Bank of England suggesting that the impact of a no-deal Brexit on the UK economy would be less severe than first thought, and estimating that GDP would drop by 5.5%. This is still a sizeable economic shock but less damaging (Partington and Wearden, 2019). However, other sources suggest that Brexit could be very damaging indeed, claiming the UK economy will be 3.5% smaller than if it had stayed in the EU (Islam, 2019), or could be plunged into a recession (Tolhurst, 2019). It is also claimed that joblessness would rapidly increase with a no-deal Brexit, increasing the UK’s unemployment rate to more than twice its current level, at about 7%. Inflation could also double to more than 5.5% (Partington and Weardon, 2019). The uncertainty associated with Brexit has already begun to drive up job losses across Britain as political turmoil holds back the economy (Partington, 2019). The number of people in work has dropped by the largest margin in four years, with companies putting hiring plans on hold, losing contracts and facing delays due to the uncertainty with Brexit (Partington, 2019). Ultimately though, the true impact of Brexit cannot be fully known until the negotiation process is over and it is decided what kind of deal, if any, has been struck. This means companies, like Monzo and Revolut need to be prepared to adapt to whatever the outcome may be.
4.3 Sociological Factors
Changing consumer expectations are fuelling the increase of digital banks in the UK, which could be a great opportunity for Monzo and Revolut (Fawthrop, 2019a). Alongside this, engagement with mobile banks with UK customers is on the rise, with digital channels being the most favoured method of personal finance (Fawthrop, 2019a). Furthermore, 71% of all banking interactions are online or digital compared to 6% happening in branch and 59% of UK consumers claim to have used mobile apps to access financial services (Fawthrop, 2019b). This suggests clear societal changes in the UK, with many more people choosing to do banking online, and less traditional in-store banking. Ultimately, demand for digital banking amongst UK customers has grown substantially in 2018, and research suggests an increasing gap of customer satisfaction levels between direct banks and branch-based banks, with direct banks coming out on top (Fawthrop, 2019a). A study commissioned by Mastercard found that convenience remains to be the biggest advantage of digital banking solutions, and additionally, Europeans demand security more than ever as their most important criteria for using digital banking solutions (Mastercard, n.d). Alongside this research, it was found that two-thirds of people expected the demand for digital banking solutions to increase in the future, and more than half of Europeans said they would consider switching to a digital bank (Mastercard, n.d). All of this evidence suggests that the outlook, in terms of consumer demand for banks like Monzo and Revolut, is generally very positive. It also suggests that Monzo and Revolut should potentially focus on reassuring consumers about the convenience and security strategies they have in place, to further inform and persuade consumers about the benefits of this type of bank.
4.4 Technological Factors
There has been a vast increase in the uptake of technology in the banking sector, but privacy and security are major concerns creating key barriers relating to the adoption of technology in this sector (Greaves, 2019). Issues with TSB online banking services locking their consumers out of accounts has also had a negative impact surrounding the use of digital banking services (Butterworth, 2018). This is likely to have impacted the reputation of digital banking and Monzo and Revolut will need to reassure consumers about these types of issues and explain strategies they have in place to avoid them. One study from ING Bank also found that consumers are still somewhat nervous about adopting new technologies, with two in three never using voice recognition or fingerprint access to log into their banking app (Greaves, 2019). This could be problematic for digital-only banks, as it suggests people might still prefer a more traditional approach, or, are not ready to use the most recent technology to access their banking services. It suggests that Monzo and Revolut should potentially wait until consumers are fully confident with the digital-only approach, before pushing other new technologies in their marketing, such as voice recognition. This will help to make sure the companies don’t overwhelm consumers. Another study found also found that although a large majority of people agreed that the latest financial technologies should be available to them, there was a reluctance to adopt newer digital ways of managing money (Greaves, 2019). This is reflected in the fact that only 12% of Britons have fully switched to a digital-only bank and 47% of those who use services such as Monzo and Revolut, keep less than £1000 in them (Greaves, 2019). However, it is also suggested that over time, if new digital approaches are shown to be useful, reliable and socially accepted, the uptake of new banking technologies could be rapid (Greaves, 2019). Furthermore, it was found that 85% of people prefer not to talk to a robot when banking and only 15% want institutions to invest in voice-banking services powered by AI (Fawthrop, 2019c). This suggests there is still a demand for banks to have traditional aspects available, such as people to talk to over the phone or in-branch. This suggests Revolut should consider investing in telephone helplines, not just online chat customer service. It also suggests that both companies potentially shouldn’t look to invest in voice-banking services in the near future.
4.5 Environmental Factors
The environmental crisis has put more pressure on businesses and individuals to cut down their carbon footprint and invest in renewable sources of energy. Energy management, in particular, is being addressed by many banks globally, and many have already given consumers the option to go paperless for their statements and transactions. The use for paper is further reduced with digital-only banks, which can only be a positive factor with so much pressure on businesses to become more environmentally friendly. Additionally, the need to drive to a bank is also reduced with online banks, which means fewer carbon emissions. This should be a factor that Monzo and Revolut push in terms of marketing, as it is such an important and current problem that is very much at the forefront of many consumers’ minds. This is shown through research which found that 88% of consumers want businesses to help them be more environmentally friendly (Townsend, 2018).
4.6 Legal Factors
The risk of legislations and regulations being altered is potentially higher at the current time, due to the political instability in the UK, and potential impacts from the UK December elections. Ultimately, there is a high probability for change of regulations in all industries though, including banking, due to Brexit. New regulations could heavily impact how Monzo and Revolut would have to operate, and this could cause complicated legal issues that the companies would need to overcome. Various high growth startups in the digital banking sector have also recently been under intense scrutiny following allegations of issues such as AML deficiencies, fraudulent accounting and toxic management culture (Finextra Research, 2019). This means that Monzo and Revolut must make sure that they are complying strictly with all applicable laws, as it seems that they are also likely to come under intense scrutiny, due to the issues with similar companies. Additionally, Monzo was only able to offer current accounts after UK banking licence restrictions were lifted in 2017, therefore if these restrictions were put back in place it may leave the company with some big problems, and unhappy consumers.
5.0 Monzo SWOT Analysis Table
|Ease of use of app and options such as instant spending notifications and a clear and intelligent budgeting system for consumers to use (Fotis, 2019). Security options to help reassure consumers, such as freezing of card option (Janes, 2019). Energy switching system which is fairly unique and could help make Monzo stand out from other providers (Meadows, 2019). Monzo was ranked as one of the best ethical current accounts (Jones, 2018). Monzo consumers are covered by FSCS deposit protection, further reassuring consumers their money is safe (Bannister, 2019). Can use the app on an iPhone, iPad, iPod touch and Apple Watch (Janes, 2019)||Lack of human interaction, which was shown to be valued (Fawthrop, 2019a). Monzo is currently running at a loss, which can be very risky for a business, and it seems that the losses will continue to increase, due to spending on staff and technology (Megaw, 2019). The company experienced a security breach, potentially negatively impacting their reputation and causing concern over security measures with digital banks (Pugh, 2019).|
|Within the 18-27 age bracket 40% are choosing to use a mobile banking app as their primary bank, rather than a more well-known brand (Fawthrop, 2019a). Using AI for fraud protection and following in the footsteps of Mimiro (Fawthrop, 2019c). Expanding further internationally, for example into Asian markets, where digital banks have started to increase in popularity (Cheh, 2019).||Traditional banks are responding to challenger banks by investing in and partnering with new technology providers to better compete, which could negatively impact digital only banks (Taddia, 2016). Few people are using digital banks as their main banks, and are keeping lower amounts of money in them, with 47% of consumer using digital banks keeping less than £1000 in the account (Greaves, 2019). Brexit could cause chaos in terms of the economy and could mean changing regulations and legislation in the banking industry, which could negatively impact Monzo.|
5.1 Monzo Strengths
Monzo have been praised for numerous elements of their business model and app design, including the ease of use of their app (Fotis, 2019). This is especially important, as it is likely that some of the consumers who use their app, may not have used one beforehand. If a company’s app is confusing, or hard to use, it could be very off-putting for consumers, especially when it is the only way the consumer can use the services offered by Monzo. Monzo consumers also have the options of instant spending notifications, meaning that they can easily see what they have spent, and this can further help them to instantly see if something fraudulent is happening, as they can see the notification come up and subsequently immediately act (Nixon, 2019). It could additionally help consumers to track spending and help them to save, helped also by Monzo’s clear and intelligent budgeting system (Fotis, 2019). The company offer some useful security options to help reassure consumers, such as the option to freeze their card if a card is lost or stolen. This is vital as research showed that security was a key barrier when it came to consumers adopting new technology for banking services. Recently, Monzo has introduced an energy switching system too, which claims to be able to save consumers money by switching to cheapest deal available for them if they use the account to pay for their gas and electric bills (Meadows, 2019). This could further entice consumers into using the company, as it is a fairly unique option, and is very convenient for a consumer. This is a strength for the company as convenience was a key factor that consumers looked for with digital banks. Additionally, the company was ranked very highly as being one of the best ethical current accounts, further appealing to the ethically conscious consumer (Jones, 2018). Furthermore, consumers with Monzo are covered by FSCS deposit protection, giving them more security over their money and helps to reassure them their money is safe. Additionally, Monzo’s app is compatible with a variety of different products, including iPads, smartphones and Apple watches (Janes, 2019). This is a key strength as tablets, wearable devices and smartphones were the most popular channels for people to interact with their bank (Fawthrop, 2019a).
5.2 Monzo Weaknesses
A key weakness with Monzo could be that human interaction is still valued highly among consumers when wanting to contact their bank (Fawthrop, 2019a). This means that consumers may not want to choose a digital-only bank as they still want human contact, for example, in-branch and assume that Monzo doesn’t provide this. Even though Monzo does have a customer service phone number, it still could be off-putting for some consumers that prefer to speak face-face with their bank. Another key weakness with Monzo is that the company are currently running at a loss which can be risky and off-putting to potential investors. It can furthermore be off-putting to consumers who want to set up banking with the company, as they could misunderstand this and think that the company are failing. Furthermore, a major weakness is the company’s recent security breach which led to customer PINS being copied onto files which could then be accessed by engineers, despite being encrypted (Pugh, 2019). This is likely to have negatively impacted the company’s reputation and potentially caused consumers to lose trust in the company. The way in which this particular issue was security-based is potentially even more problematic, as security issues were a key barrier when it came to consumers adopting new technology in banking services. This means that those who were anxious about using this type of digital-only bank could have been deterred by this recent issue.
5.3 Monzo Opportunities
There are a variety of opportunities in the digital banking sector. Research showed that 40% of people in the 18-27 age bracket were choosing to use a banking app as their primary bank, instead of a more well-known name (Fawthrop, 2019a). This suggests that Monzo should primarily aim the app at people in this age range, as it seems that they are already potentially interested in this type of product, and are, therefore, a key market. Another potential opportunity for the company is the use of AI for fraud protection, following in the footsteps of fellow UK fintech Mimiro (Fawthrop, 2019c). Mimiro managed to raise 22.9 million in financing for its anti-money laundering fraud prevention (Fawthrop, 2019c). Implementing AI correctly could reap big rewards for the company, including increased security, lower costs and higher customer satisfaction (Fawthrop, 2019c). Another potential opportunity for the company is to expand further internationally, into Asian markets, where there is a growing number of digital banks appearing (Cheh, 2019). This is shown through the fact that digital banking penetration in Asia’s emerging markets has, on average, increased 3-fold since 2014 (Cheh, 2019). This is thought to be due to the regions growing number of young, affluent and smartphone-first population (Cheh, 2019).
5.4 Monzo Threats
There are several threats that Monzo needs to consider when making future strategic business decisions. Banks are now responding to challenger banks, like Monzo, by investing in and partnering with new technology providers (Taddia, 2016). For example, BBVA has bought digital-only banks Atom and Simple, and Clydesdale and Yorkshire Bank’s app-based bank (Taddia, 2016). This is so that they can better compete, and essentially give customers both traditional and innovative options, in the same place, when it comes to banking. This could put digital-only banks at risk, and make it harder for them to compete in the market. Monzo will need to comprehensively look at what messages they can push with their marketing to show consumers how they don’t need any of the bonuses of traditional banks, such as in-store customer service. It would also be potentially useful to inform consumers that Monzo could be the more environmentally friendly brand, with the lack of need to go to a branch and less need to waste paper. Another threat to Monzo is how consumers are using the banking service. Few people are currently using digital banks as their main banks, and are therefore keeping lower amounts of money in them (Fotis, 2019). This is shown through a study which found 47% of consumers using digital banks kept less than £1000 in the account (Greaves, 2019). Monzo, therefore, needs to focus on how to persuade consumers to use their digital-only service as their primary bank. Furthermore, a big current threat is the changes that may come from Brexit and the UK December elections. It is impossible to guess what the outcomes of these issues may be, but there are many changes in the economy and in regulations and legislation that are possible, and that could negatively impact the company. This means Monzo need to be prepared to adapt to a potentially changing industry climate.
6.0 Revolut SWOT Analysis Table
|Offers an impressive range of innovative products, for example transfers into 29 different currencies and offers cryptocurrency exchange (Russon, 2019). Larger global market of users, compared to Monzo (Whitwell, 2018). Offers options such as instant payment notifications and security features such as freezing the consumers card via the app (Warren, 2019). Compared to competitors Monzo and Starling, Revolut is the cheapest when sending money abroad, as there is no charge up to £5000 (Revolut, 2019). Travel and device insurance can be added, using geolocation and offers pay per day cover, with great flexibility (Finextra, 2018).||Revolut consumers are not protected by the FSCS, but competitors Monzo and Starling consumers are (Whitwell, 2018). Can only be contacted by online chat, there is no telephone number (Whitwell, 2018) Charge downgrade fees if a person wants to close account or swap to a cheaper account (Whitwell, 2018). A whistleblower complained to the FCE in 2016 asking it to investigate the compliance of Revolut and the conduct of its chief executive, specifically because the systems in place for flagging suspect payments were completely inadequate (Russon, 2019). Advertising campaign accused of shaming single people was featured for Valentine’s day in 2018 (Russon, 2018).|
|Further expansion internationally into areas outside of Europe, for example Hong Kong. In Hong Kong retail banking is very profitable and there is a lot of potential for digital only banks (Crow and Ruehl 2019). Within the 18-27 age bracket 40% are choosing to use a mobile banking app as their primary bank, rather than a more well-known brand (Fawthrop, 2019a).||Traditional banks are trying to keep up with digital only by investing in newer technology, e.g Lloyds have revamped their banking app, including introduction of a savings pot, and instant payment notifications (Nixon, 2019). Competitors Monzo and Starling offer some interest with certain account criteria and partners e.g Monzo has partnered with Osk North and now offers 1% with an instant access account, with a minimum initial deposit of £500, whereas Revolut offer no interest at all (Richardson, 2019). Competitors Monzo and Starling also offer unlimited ATM withdrawals, whereas Revolut only allow up to £200 free (Revolut, 2019).|
6.1 Revolut Strengths
Revolut offers a very impressive range of innovative products and services for consumers, including transfers into 29 different currencies and cryptocurrency exchange (Russon, 2019). This means the company can appeal to a wide array of consumers, and in particular, could appeal to those who may frequently travel abroad. Another strength that could appeal to travellers particularly, is how Revolut is the cheapest, compared to key competitors Monzo and Starling, when consumers want to send money abroad, having no charge for this service (Revolut, 2019). Additionally, the company offer travel and device insurance, which can be added and paid by the day, with great flexibility (Finextra, 2018). Additionally, the company have a larger global market of users, compared to key competitor Monzo (Whitwell, 2018). This means they have a larger potential target market and operate in more countries than Monzo does, too. Revolut offer options such as instant payment notifications and security features such as freezing the card via the app (Warren, 2019). This can help to reassure consumers that their money is safe, which is important as security was a key barrier relating to the adoption of technology in the banking industry. It could furthermore have the potential to detect fraud quicker, as if a consumer sees a payment notification that wasn’t them, they can quickly act.
6.2 Revolut Weaknesses
Revolut has several weaknesses that could impact them negatively in the future. Firstly, consumers are not protected by the FSCS (Whitwell, 2018). This could be very off-putting for consumers as FSCS is a type of protection for people’s money, and ensures that if a bank fails, consumers are protected up to certain amounts, and therefore don’t lose all their money (Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd, 2019). Another weakness of Revolut is how consumers can only contact the company via online chat (Whitwell, 2018). There is no telephone number, which could be frustrating if consumers need immediate help and are not finding that help over online chat. It could also be frustrating for consumers who are more comfortable seeking help over the phone. Furthermore, it was found that human interaction is still valued by consumers in the banking industry (Fawthrop, 2019a), so this could be something Revolut should think about introducing (Fawthrop, 2019c). Another weakness with Revolut services is that they charge downgrade fees for consumers who want to swap to a cheaper account option or for those with a premium account who just to close their account altogether (Whitwell, 2018). This could be frustrating for consumers, in particular for those just wanting to close an account, as they are essentially be asked to pay before they are allowed to close an account. This could lead to the person becoming frustrated, and not wanting to ever use the service again, alongside potential negative word-of-mouth marketing. Another weakness for Revolut is the bad press they have gained, as a relatively new company. They have had numerous issues that have resulted in negative press and thus potentially negatively impacted their reputation. One of these is when a whistleblower complained to the FCE in 2016, asking it to investigate the compliance of Revolut and conduct of its chief executive, specifically as the systems in place for flagging suspect payments were inadequate (Russon, 2019). This could suggest to consumers that the company is not safe to use, causing further problems. Another example of a further publicity issue was when Revolut released an advertising campaign for Valentine’s day 2016, which many people claimed was shaming single people (Russon, 2018). All of the negative press could lead to a negative reputation and be very off-putting for consumers. This is especially important since the company is fairly new, and therefore potentially isn’t seen as being as reputable as a traditional banking service provider.
6.3 Revolut Opportunities
A key opportunity for Revolut is further expansion into areas outside of Europe. A particular opportunity could be in Hong Kong, where retail banking is very profitable and there is a lot of potential for digital-only banks (Crow and Ruehl, 2019). Another key opportunity is the 18-27 age bracket, as 40% are choosing to use a mobile banking app as their primary bank, rather than a more well-known brand (Fawthrop, 2019a). Another market that could be a good opportunity for Revolut is within the 18-27 age group, but specifically travellers within this age bracket. This is because the company have a few options, such as currency exchange, which would appeal to travellers. Furthermore, within the 18-25 age range 230,000 young people choose to take a gap year and go travelling, hence making this an ideal opportunity and target sector for Revolut to market their services towards (Year Out Group, 2018).
6.4 Revolut Threats
There are a number of threats that Revolut should keep track of and consider before making future strategic business decisions. Traditional banks are trying to keep up with digital only banks by investing in new technology. For example, Lloyds have revamped their banking app, including introducing a savings pot and instant payment notifications (Nixon, 2019). Traditional banks introducing new technology could be a key threat to Revolut, as it means that consumers could have the option of having traditional elements, such as the in-store customer service, alongside the benefits that come with digital only banks, such as instant payment notifications. This essentially could mean that consumers could have the best of both, and therefore digital only banks could struggle to entice consumers with their benefits. Revolut’s key competitors Monzo and Starling could also be a threat, as they both offer some sort of interest on various accounts, whereas Revolut don’t (Revolut, 2019). This could make consumers favour them, over Revolut, if they intend on keeping significant amounts of money in the account. Furthermore, Starling and Monzo both offer free unlimited ATM withdrawals, whereas Revolut have a limit of £200, and after this consumers are charged (Revolut, 2019). This means that the company may need to think of new ideas to convince consumers that they are a better option compared to competitors, or change their current offerings to meet those of key competitors.
7.0 Comparison of Monzo and Revolut
There are some key differences between Monzo and Revolut, and also some similarities between the two companies. In general, both companies offer some of the same services, including current accounts, instant spending notifications and optional freezing of a consumer’s card if lost or stolen. There are some key differences though, including how Revolut offer varying different accounts, that cost different fees, and multi-currency accounts and Monzo just offer accounts with no fees, and no multi-currency accounts (Money Super Market, n.d). Additionally, Revolut appears to offer more options that would appeal to consumers who frequently travel, such as transfers to 29 different currencies, no charge for sending money abroad and the option to add travel and device insurance (Finextra, 2018). On the other hand, Monzo has introduced an energy switching option, and Monzo consumers are covered by the FSCS, potentially appealing to the more security conscious and money-conscious consumers (Bannister, 2019; Meadows, 2019). In terms of weaknesses, Revolut has had quite significant amounts of negative press, including relating to advertising campaigns and whistleblowers at the company. Monzo has also had issues with negative publicity, most recently due to a security issue. This means both companies have potentially negatively impacted their reputations, and both need to focus on increasing trust and reputation amongst their consumers. Revolut may also have a weakness in the way in which they charge downgrade fees if premium account holders want to close their accounts or downgrade, which could be very off-putting. As Monzo only offer free accounts, this is not a problem which could make them more appealing due to the simplicity and lack of hidden fees. Both companies have some of the same threats in terms of traditional banks investing in new technology, therefore both companies need to ensure they are ready for these threats and have prepared a plan of action so that they can continue to grow and provide consumers needs and wants. Other threats for Revolut relate directly to Monzo, including how Monzo allows unlimited ATM withdrawals and offer some interest on current accounts, provided they meet particular criteria. Revolut has none of these benefits, which could be problematic long-term, with consumers potentially preferring Monzo or other competitors due to these particular elements.
Overall, both companies have various elements they can work on, and the strengths they should promote. It appears that Revolut is likely to be more suitable for keen travellers, due to the multi-currency account and the other travel-friendly options. On the other hand, Monzo is likely a better option for consumers who want to save money, as they have an energy switching service and offer interest if a consumer meets certain criteria. It is hard to say which company is likely to be more favourable long-term, as it appears they are both better for different consumer types. Furthermore, both could be impacted by Brexit, but it is very difficult to say how positively or negatively, due to the EU deal not being confirmed as yet. Both companies need to keep track of traditional banks who are trying desperately to compete now against the challenger banks, so need to continue to stay ahead and look to introduce new, better features first.
In terms of external potential external impacts on Monzo and Revolut, there are many which could impact both of the companies. In particular, Brexit is a key element and could impact several different factors, such as the UK economy and legislation, which could then negatively or positively impact the companies. Another key external factor is the current environmental crisis, which has led to more people trying to lower their carbon footprint and be more environmentally friendly. This could be something which both banks could use as a key reason to use their services, as there is a lack of need to go in-branch, thus potentially lowering carbon footprint, and also a lack of need for the use of paper. The demand for online and digital banking transactions is set to increase, thus potentially being a key positive impact on both companies futures. Ultimately, with all of the external impacts, both Monzo and Revolut need to track them, so that they can then be prepared to quickly adapt if needed, to market conditions and factors.
Both companies have varying strengths and weaknesses, with some overlap too. In particular, Monzo seems to be very suitable and shows key strengths for consumers who are very money conscious, as it offers some interest in particular accounts, and an energy switching service to help people save money. However, Revolut appears to have key strengths in foreign currency and excels in ways that would be ideal for keen travellers, such as offering travel insurance using geolocation technology and multi-currency accounts. In terms of weaknesses, both companies have had negative press for various reasons, thus potentially negatively impacting their reputations. Revolut also has a potential lack of customer service options and no FSCS protection for consumers. It is vital that both companies work on their weaknesses, and look to use their strengths to their advantages, to continue to compete in the industry.
the companies share some of the same opportunities and threats, therefore they
should look to take advantage of those opportunities before other competitors
do. Threats should be very carefully monitored to ensure that Monzo and Revolut
are prepared and able to adapt to potential future market conditions and
competitor actions. It is also important that if a competitor is offering
something much better, for example, Monzo offering unlimited free ATM
withdrawals, that Revolut can either match this or push the marketing of
something else that Monzo doesn’t offer. Ultimately, both companies need to
keep on top of the constantly changing market conditions and try to ensure they
are ahead of the competition, using strengths to their advantage and working on
bettering their weaknesses.
Bannister, R. (2019). App-based banking. [online] MoneySavingExpert.com. Available at: https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/banking/digital-banking/ [Accessed 6 Nov. 2019].
Butterworth, B. (2018). TSB online banking problems: What’s happened?. [online] Inews.co.uk. Available at: https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/tsb-online-banking-problems-what-happened-bank-issues-508093 [Accessed 5 Nov. 2019].
Carey, S. (2018). We’ve ranked the UK’s digital challenger banks. [online] Techworld.com. Available at: https://www.techworld.com/startups/ranked-uks-new-breed-of-digital-only-challenger-banks-3635411/ [Accessed 29 Oct. 2019].
Cheh, S. (2019). Digital banks are coming to Southeast Asia. [online] Kr-Asia.com. Available at: https://kr-asia.com/digital-banks-are-coming-to-southeast-asia [Accessed 6 Nov. 2019].
Crow, D. and Ruehl, M. (2019). New digital banks challenge HSBC’s Hong Kong dominance | Financial Times. [online] Ft.com. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/188d4480-8cb4-11e9-a1c1-51bf8f989972 [Accessed 6 Nov. 2019].
Crowe (2019). The Financial Cost of Fraud 2018. [online] Crowe.com. Available at: https://www.crowe.com/uk/croweuk/-/media/Crowe/Firms/Europe/uk/CroweUK/PDF-publications/Financial-Cost-of-Fraud-2018.ashx?la=en-GB&hash=F3D9DED968C59B2469729C7FDCDDFF9B481C65BC [Accessed 30 Oct. 2019].
Dillet, R. (2015). Revolut Raises $2.3 Million For Its Mobile Foreign Exchange Service – TechCrunch. Retrieved 4 November 2019, from https://techcrunch.com/2015/07/20/revolut-raises-2-3-million-for-its-mobile-foreign-exchange-service/
Fawthrop, A. (2019a). Rise of digital banks in the UK is gaining momentum, finds FIS survey. [online] nsbanking.com. Available at: https://www.nsbanking.com/analysis/rise-digital-banks-fis/ [Accessed 29 Oct. 2019].
Fawthrop, A. (2019b). Worldpay looking to capitalise on Australia and New Zealand e-commerce. [online] nsbanking.com. Available at:
Worldpay looking to capitalise on e-commerce growth in Australia and New Zealand[Accessed 29 Oct. 2019].
Fawthrop, A. (2019c). AI banking trends: From virtual assistants to anti-money laundering tech. [online] Nsbanking.com. Available at: https://www.nsbanking.com/analysis/ai-banking/ [Accessed 30 Oct. 2019].
Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd. (2019). Home. [online] Fscs.org.uk. Available at: https://www.fscs.org.uk/ [Accessed 7 Nov. 2019].
Finextra Research (2018). Revolut introduces pay-per-day geolocation travel insurance service. [online] Finextra.com. Available at: https://www.finextra.com/pressarticle/72177/revolut-introduces-pay-per-day-geolocation-travel-insurance-service [Accessed 7 Nov. 2019].
Finextra Research (2019). N26 is the latest fintech unicorn to face regulatory scrutiny. [online] finextra.co.uk. Available at https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/33677/n26-is-the-latest-fintech-unicorn-to-face-regulatory-scrutiny [Accessed 5 Nov. 2019]
Fotis, M. (2019). Is mobile banking app Monzo too good to be true?. [online] Life.spectator.co.uk. Available at:
Is mobile banking app Monzo too good to be true?[Accessed 6 Nov. 2019].
Greaves, E. (2019). The digital banking revolution is here. So why are so few people putting their salaries into app-only bank accounts?. [online] Moneywise.co.uk. Available at: https://www.moneywise.co.uk/news/2019-05-28%E2%80%8C%E2%80%8C/digital-banking-revolution-here-so-why-are-so-few-people-putting-their-salaries [Accessed 5 Nov. 2019].
Herrala, R. and Ariss, R.T., 2013. Credit constraints, political instability, and capital accumulation (No. 13-246). International Monetary Fund.
Islam, F. (2019). Brexit deal means ‘£70bn hit to UK by 2029′. [online] Bbc.co.uk. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50219036?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cv0kerlpjwvt/economic-effects-of-brexit&link_location=live-reporting-story [Accessed 4 Nov. 2019].
Janes, L. (2019). Monzo mobile banking app review: what’s it like for current account holders?. [online] Lovemoney.com. Available at: https://www.lovemoney.com/news/85040/monzo-mobile-banking-app-review-current-account-holders [Accessed 6 Nov. 2019].
Jones, R. (2018). Monzo is ‘one of the best’ ethical current accounts. [online] Theguardian.com. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2018/may/19/monzo-ethical-current-account-app-bank-triodos-ecology-building-society [Accessed 5 Nov. 2019].
Mastercard (n.d.). Digital banking has become part of European’s everyday life new study from Mastercard reveals. [online] Newsroom.mastercard.com. Available at: https://newsroom.mastercard.com/eu/press-releases/digital-banking-has-become-part-of-europeans-everyday-life-new-study-from-mastercard-reveals/ [Accessed 8 Nov. 2019].
Meadows, S. (2019). Monzo launches energy switching service – but it could cost you £115 a year. [online] Telegraph.co.uk. Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/bills-and-utilities/gas-electric/monzo-launches-energy-switching-service-could-cost-115-year/ [Accessed 5 Nov. 2019].
Megaw, N. (2019). Monzo boss upbeat on progress despite mounting losses. [Online] Ft.com. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/d5613ce6-9822-11e9-9573-ee5cbb98ed36 [Accessed 6 Nov. 2019].
Money Super Market (n.d.). Monzo Bank Current Accounts. [online] Moneysupermarket.com. Available at: https://www.moneysupermarket.com/current-accounts/providers/monzo/ [Accessed 8 Nov. 2019].
Monzo (2017). Welcome to Monzo Bank!. [online] Monzo.com. Available at: https://monzo.com/blog/2017/04/05/banking-licence [Accessed 29 Oct. 2019].
Monzo (2019). Annual report 2018. [online] Monzo.com. Available at: https://monzo.com/annual-report/2018/ [Accessed 29 Oct. 2019].
Moore, J. (2010). Political interference is banks’ biggest risk. [online] Independent.co.uk. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/political-interference-is-banks-biggest-risk-1885360.html [Accessed 4 Nov. 2019].
Nixon, G. (2019). Lloyds in bid to keep up with Monzo and Starling with new app features. [online] Thisismoney.co.uk. Available at: https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/saving/article-6847061/Lloyds-attempts-Monzo-Starling-new-app-features.html [Accessed 6 Nov. 2019].
Partington, R. (2019). Brexit uncertainty drives up job losses and holds back economy. [Online] Theguardian.com. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/oct/25/brexit-uncertainty-drives-up-job-losses-and-holds-back-economy [Accessed 4 Nov. 2019].
Partington, R. and Wearden, G. (2019). Bank of England: no-deal Brexit less severe than first thought. [online] Theguardian.com. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/04/bank-of-england-revises-impact-of-no-deal-brexit-from-8-to-5-of-gdp [Accessed 30 Oct. 2019].
Pugh, R. (2019). Monzo issues urgent warning following security breach. [Online] Manchestereveningnews.co.uk. Available at: https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/whats-on/shopping/monzo-bank-security-breach-pin-16706230 [Accessed 6 Nov. 2019].
Revolut (2019). How can we help?. [online] Revolut.com. Available at: https://www.revolut.com/help/transaction-issues/transfers/why-was-i-charged-a-fee-for-my-transfer [Accessed 7 Nov. 2019].
Richardson, D. (2019). Reviewed: new Monzo savings accounts pay 1.55% – Which? News. [Online] Which.co.uk. Available at: https://www.which.co.uk/news/2019/03/monzo-to-offer-1-55-interest-on-its-savings-pots-but-are-the-rates-any-good/ [Accessed 7 Nov. 2019].
Russon, M. (2019). What is Revolut?. [online] Bbc.co.uk. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47768661 [Accessed 6 Nov. 2019].
Taddia, M. (2016). Banking: legal challenges. [online] lawgazette.co.uk. Available at: https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/features/banking-legal-challenges/5059069.article [Accessed 30 Oct. 2019].
Tolhurst, A. (2019). No-deal Brexit could plunge the UK into recession, says OECD. [Online] Politicshome.com. Available at: https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/economy/economic-growth/news/106647/no-deal-brexit-could-plunge-uk-recession-says-oecd [Accessed 4 Nov. 2019].
Townsend, S. (2018). 88% Of Consumers Want You To Help Them Make A Difference. [Online] Forbes.com. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/solitairetownsend/2018/11/21/consumers-want-you-to-help-them-make-a-difference/#7f57fc0e6954 [Accessed 5 Nov. 2019].
Warren, T. (2019). Monzo launches its ‘bank of the future’ in the US. [online] Theverge.com. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/13/18677298/monzo-bank-us-launch-date-availability [Accessed 7 Nov. 2019].
Whitwell, J. (2018). Are Monzo, Revolut, Starling and Transferwise safe to bank with?. [Online] Thisismoney.co.uk. Available at: https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-6080099/Are-Monzo-Revolut-Starling-Transferwise-safe-bank-with.html [Accessed 6 Nov. 2019].
Year Out Group (2018). Gap year statistics to help take the leap. [online] Yearoutgroup.org. Available at: https://yearoutgroup.org/gap-year-statistics/ [Accessed 7 Nov. 2019].